Type your search keyword, and press enter

About the Author

Ajit Gaddam

Day job as a Security Architect for a fortune 100 company where I leverage information security to help achieve my company's business goals and objectives. Connect with me on Google+ follow me on Twitter or add me onLinkedIn

Good List of Open Source Security Projects

This is a compilation of some excellent open source security projects.  I will continue to update this page. Insert in comments below if you have any good reference projects or open source security tools. I am excluding the obvious ones like Metasploit and Bro for example, in this list.

Platform / Host Security

OSQuery from Facebook

Reference Link: https://osquery.io/

Github linkhttps://github.com/facebook/osquery

Commercial Comparison: The commercial equivalent functionality is with Tanium.

Description: osquery gives you the ability to query and log things like running processes, logged in users, password changes, usb devices, firewall exceptions, listening ports, and more. It allows you to easily ask questions about your Linux and OSX infrastructure. Whether your goal is intrusion detection, infrastructure reliability, or compliance

Continue reading “Good List of Open Source Security Projects”

Speaking at Black Hat USA 2015

Very excited to announce my selection and participation in Black Hat USA 2015 being held in Las Vegas this year. My talk is titled ‘Securing Your Big Data Environment’. Come join me in the South Seas CDF room in Mandalay Bay between 16:20 – 17:10 hours.

Link to Black Hat: https://www.blackhat.com/us-15/briefings.html#securing-your-big-data-environment

Ajit Gaddam Black Hat Speaker

Summary of the talk: Hadoop and big data are no longer buzz words in large enterprises. Whether for the correct reasons or not, enterprise data warehouses are moving to Hadoop and along with it come petabytes of data. How do you ensure big data in Hadoop does not become a big problem or a big target. Vendors pitch their technologies as the magical silver bullet. However, did you realize that some controls are dependent on how many maps are available in the production cluster. What about the structure of the data being loaded? How much overhead does decryption operation add? If tokenizing data, how do you distinguish between in and original production data? However, in certain ways, Hadoop and big data represent a greenfield opportunity for security practitioners. It provides a chance to get ahead of the curve, test and deploy your tools, processes, patterns, and techniques before big data becomes a big problem.

Come join this session, where we walk through control frameworks we built and what we discovered, reinvented, polished, and developed to support data security, compliance, cryptographic protection, and effective risk management for sensitive data.

Indicators of Compromise List and Recommended Security Measures

Unlike loss of a physical device, if an attacker breaks into your corporate network, you still have your data after they steal it. It is more important that ever to detect if your company has been broken into by a hacker. This article identifies a number of indicators of compromise activity on a corporate network. It is not an exhaustive list and I will keep adding to this list along with any recommended security measures you can take to detect and prevent activity that could lead to a compromise of your network by attackers.

Logging: When you log, you can detect and identify any unusual activity on your network and on the end points.

  • Look for logfile line count and log file line length. Have an average baseline of our log file size at a minimum and then trigger alerts when the log size increases or even worse decrease of events that day.
  • Look for spikes in traffic types (e.g. SSH, FTP, DNS) and baseline the number of events including bandwidth usage
  • Look for country of origin of IP connection (or by protocol)


  • Scan for the software/tools listed in “List of Publicly Available Tools used for Attacks” below. These include scanning for non-malicious network utilities like SysInternals and PsTools that are not rated as malicious by AV and others, but good tools for use by an attacker.
  • Scan for RDP Sessions in HKCV\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Shell\BagMRU and related keys
  • Scan for remote access services – VNC, RDP
  • Scan for remote access ports (TCP 3389, RDP or VNC)
  • Scan for batch files and scripts
  • Scan for multiple archive files – ZIPs and RARs including encrypted compressed files
  • Scan for rar/zip file compression in page files and unallocated spaces
  • Scan for programs run in the AppCompatCache
  • Scan for sysadmin tools executed such as tlist.exe, local.exe, kill.exe
  • Scan for files in the root of C:\RECYCLER
  • Scan for anomalies like abnormal source location or logon time (for example after say 7pm EST) and other time-of-use rules and baselines

Continue reading “Indicators of Compromise List and Recommended Security Measures”

Does Using Google Libraries API CDN give you Performance Benefits?

Google Libraries API CDNA CDN – short for Content Distribution Network helps serve content with high availability and provides performance benefits along with faster page load times. The Google Libraries API is a CDN for serving the most popular, open-source JavaScript libraries and allows any website to use it for free. Examples include Dojo, jQuery, Prototype among others.

Why use a CDN?

The greatest benefit is from caching. The theory is that if a visitor visited a site that was loading their JavaScript libraries, say jQuery for example from the Google CDN, then when they visit your website, the library is already in that user’s browser cache and will not have to be downloaded again. This sounds great in theory. I decided to put this theory to the test for the popular jQuery library and how likely is it where a visitor will arrive at your site with a cache for that JavaScript file.

Tracking Performance with HTTP Archive

In order to track the speed of the web over time, Google built and developed the HTTP Archive as an open source service. They transitioned the ownership and maintenance of it to the Internet Archive. It is a permanent repository of web performance information such as page size, requests made, and technologies utilized. Their list of URLs is based solely on the Alexa Top 1,000,000 sites. As of March 2012, there were a total of 77082 sites analyzed. This count is expected to ramp up to cover the top 1 Million websites on the Internet soon.

Google Libraries API CDN

Running analysis of the HTTP Archive for the usage of Google Libraries API, we got a count of 14345 sites of the 77082 sites tested. This is almost 18.61% which is quite impressive. However, this count does not account for the different libraries and their versions. This is important as sites must reference the exact same CDN URL from either Google or Microsoft or any other CDN to obtain the cross-site caching benefits.

In case you were curious, the Microsoft CDN is only used in 157 of the sites tested or only 0.2% of the most popular websites on the Internet leverage it compared to the 18.61% that leverage the Google Libraries API CDN.

Sites using Google Libraries API
Sites using Google Libraries API

Test 1:  Validate the Google APIs reference

We want to verify the 18.61% of the pages. This count of 14345 sites comes from an HTTP request containing ‘googleapis.com’ anywhere in the URL. The query used to extract this particular statistic was

FROM requests
WHERE url LIKE '%googleapis.com%';

Google API reference in HTTP Archive

Test 2: Determine the percentage of pages that ran a jQuery version

Next, we want to determine the percentage of pages that was using atleast some version of  jQuery from the list of the sites in the HTTP Archive. Running the following SQL query gives us the result of 11145 or 14.45% of the total sites analyzed.

FROM requests 
WHERE url LIKE 'http%://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/%';

jQuery Count in HTTP Archive

Test 3: Determine jQuery versions

Next, we want to determine the breakdown for each distinct URL that represented jQuery. Again, this is the statistic that would determine the cross-site caching benefit. Running the following query gives us the breakdown below:

SELECT url, COUNT(DISTINCT pageid) AS count
FROM requests 
WHERE url LIKE 'https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/%' 
Version Protocol %age Count
1.4.2 http 2.19% 1695
1.3.2 http 1.48% 1142
1.7.1 http 1.34% 1039
1.6.2 http 0.69% 533
1.5.2 http 0.68% 529
1.4.4 http 0.61% 474
1.6.1 http 0.58% 450
1.6.4 http 0.53% 414
1.7.1 https 0.47% 366
1.4 http 0.40% 316

This proves that the fragmentation issues are very real. This reveals that the most popular URL for loading jQuery was jQuery 1.4.2 via http. This constitutes only 2.19% (1695 out of 77082) of all the websites tested. The next most popular is jQuery 1.3.2 with 1.48% (1142 out of 77082) and so on. It is not just the fragmentation of the different libraries used, but also the different protocols (e.g. http vs. https) since they are cached separately.

Another frustration is the “latest version” reference results. This allows you to request either version 1 or 1.x and automatically receive 1.x.y version.You can see the full output of the above query posted on GitHub if you are interested.

Conclusion & Recommendations

So, is using a CDN like Google Libraries API really provide you the performance boost via cross-site caching? The answer is most conclusively proven to be NO and is not likely to benefit your first time visitors. The assumption that many of your website’s first time users will have a JavaScript cached – because they happen to visit another site that uses the exact same version of the same JavaScript library is wrong as shown by the fragmented nature of the web above. It also depends on how likely your visitor target demographic matches that of the sites using the CDN.

  1. You are most likely better off bundling jQuery with the rest of your site’s JavaScript
  2. Make sure to use the Expires header to make HTTP requests cacheable since for your repeat visitors, it doesn’t matter where the file was served from
  3. Browser users leveraging privacy options that clear the cache (e.g. privacy.clearOnShutdown.cache option) between browser sessions cannot leverage the assumed benefits of a CDN distribution
  4. Another point of note coming from Steve Souders is that the amount of disk space for caching has not caught up with people’s usage of the web. For example, IE has a default cache size of 8 – 50 MB, Firefox has 50MB, Opera has 20MB and Chrome has ~80MB. Mobile phones have an even smaller size limit. This cache will eventually fill up and when it happens, the FIFO (first-in-first-out) rule applies where cached resources need to make way for new ones.
  5. If websites are using the https reference to a JS library, the browsers usually default to not caching those files to disk when they are retrieved using SSL.
  6. If you are still considering experimenting using the Google Libraries API or another CDN for libraries, use something like Yahoo’s Boomerang. This piece of JavaScript measures a whole bunch of performance characteristics of your user’s web browsing experience. All you have to do is stick it into your web pages and call the init() method.